Re: GNOME 3 from Fedora user's perpective - request for changes

Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@...> writes:

> .... 
> > The reaction (not overreaction) by "old-timers" is based on their experience
> > with what works and what not, and with technical and non-technical user
> > bases.
> > Most of these birds are (and should be) concerned with ease-of-use and sane
> > continuity of design of their daily tools.
> Bogus.  Don't try the old-war-horse defense.  I'm an old war horse.
> Professional UNIX admin for >15 years, used LINUX since kernel 0.99a,
> and paid subscriber back in the Ximian days.
> There are lots of things that are clunky in the 'legacy' 2.x GNOME,  3.0
> has some shiney-and-new wobbles, but the direction is well thought out.
> Things change.  Move on.


I am aware of what innovation is and *am for* moving to GNOME 3.
You misrepresent my intentions.

I am aginst a psedo-innovation like in case I described in my original post.
It is limited to that aspect, for now.
Get it.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]