Re: migration

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Gregory Leblanc
<headmaster albus dumbledore gmail com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Tobias Mueller
> <muelli auftrags-killer org> wrote:
>> On 28.01.2011 13:03, Olav Vitters wrote:
>>> It needs SSL, so dedicated IP address (sort of,
>>> you can share it I heard, but that doesn't work on IE properly..).
>> Didn't know we care about IE. But
>> <> lists IE
>> 7 supporting SNI. Hence, we don't need a seperate IP address and can
>> deploy HTTPS everywhere.
> I don't think you read that carefully enough.  In particular, see
>  IE 7 only supports SNI on Windows Vista and newer.  IE on Windows XP
> does not support SNI due to limitations of the TLS stack.
>     Greg

Why bother debating ssl so much? That is beside the point and is
mostly OT for this thread. For stuff that needs ssl, we can just
create subinterfaces (ie: eth0:0) if absolutely necessary and ip them
with a separate ip. This isn't rocket surgery gentlemen.

The only issue is us getting ip addresses to begin with and that is
completely orthogonal to this discussion.

Jeff Schroeder

Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]