Re: Time to move GGV to the Attic?



I wasn't going to post in this thread anymore but this message refers to
me by name (in the search) and mischaracterizes heavily what I said
previously.

On Tue, 2006-18-07 at 10:15 -0400, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> Not to flame or troll, but there was a mention of several glaring
> functional issues with GGV's replacement Evince, and a plethora of
> bugs filed against evince. However, out of curiosity, I entered this
> query into bugzilla
> 
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=Guelzow&product=evince&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=CLOSED&resolution=FIXED&resolution=WONTFIX&resolution=DUPLICATE&resolution=NOTABUG&resolution=NOTGNOME&resolution=INCOMPLETE&resolution=INVALID&resolution=GNOME1.x&resolution=MOVED&resolution=OBSOLETE&resolution=NOTXIMIAN&resolution=---&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailqa_contact2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=
> 
> and maybe I misformatted it or something, but the result was a Zarro
> Boogs Found....

I don't know why you search didn't return anything, since there is for
example: 

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=347849

Moreover please check the messages I wrote on this topic:

On Mon, 2006-17-07 at 11:34 -0600, Andreas J. Guelzow wrote: 
> I prefer the look and feel of evince but find myself frequently using
> ggv because evince can't handle things correctly.

> Well, I have received enough "works for us...must be your
> set-up...NOTABUG" responses or no response at all that I have given up
> on filing bugs on anything of the core GNOME desktop and developer
> platform.

So searching on bug reports for evince clearly would not yield much. In
fact I may never have filed a bug on evince except the very recent one
mentioned above.
> 

> 
> I don't mean to attack, but what exactly are these major issues? I
> don't want to thread hijack, and maybe you did file several bugs, and
> I just never found them. But I am curious, so I request a moment of
> humoring for my sake.
> 
> Althought I would ask, please be nice, there is no need to trash
> developers who have worked hard and long on a product, please be
> constructive with this feedback, you have an open ear, I honestly want
> to know what has gotten you so angered about Evince.

I am not angered about evince. As I said earlier I in fact like it. This
thread is about ggv, and the stupidity to claim that a maintained
program is always better than an unmaintained one.

And if it should just be about moving unmaintained code into archive
then this should be happen with all such unmaintained code! 
> 

Andreas




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]