Re: Time to move GGV to the Attic? (Was: Subversion migration recap (cut-off Friday July 14th))

[Petr Tomasek <tomasek etf cuni cz>]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:20:51AM -0400, Kevin Kubasik wrote:
> I think that's more an issue with envice than if we should retire the
> ggv module. ggv development is more or less dead (near as I can tell)
> and envice is its replacement. If there are features that you want to
> see Incorporated into envice, I would recommend filing a bug.
> 
> Here is the CIA Stats for ggv
> http://cia.navi.cx/stats/project/gnome/ggv
> 
> You will notice that the last change to any actual code was May 10th,
> 2005 and you have to go back significantly before that to find active
> feature development. If the ggv module owner wants to keep it active,
> then I guess that's all cool, but barring someone for the ggv devel
> team speaking up, I would say attic time...
> 

GGV just works. Evince sucks. So you want to drop ggv just
because it is "actively developed"?

P.

-- 
Petr Tomasek <http://www.etf.cuni.cz/~tomasek>