pvanhoof issue (was: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap)

From: Zeeshan Ali <zeenix gmail com>
To: foundation-list gnome org
Subject: pvanhoof issue (was: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 04:02:20 +0200

Hi everyone,

> I don't think we need ethics-teachings about this. We GNOME programmers
> know. We do.

I can't say for others but I for one find it extremely insulting when Mr. Van Hoof represent me without my concent. I really want to know who in the the hell made him the GNOME developers' representative and be able to tell others what I know and need?

--
Regards Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Sent from Nokia N900

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pvanhoof issue (was: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap)
  - From: Philip Van Hoof
- Re: pvanhoof issue (was: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap)
  - From: Olav Vitters

References:
- GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Juanjo Marin
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Dave Neary
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Dave Neary
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Dave Neary
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Juanjo Marin
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Stormy Peters
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Ivan Frade
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Diego Escalante Urrelo
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap
  - From: Philip Van Hoof

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]