Re: GNOME: lack of strategic roadmap

[Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>]

On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 00:30 +0000, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> I'm going to call for an end of thread,

I think you're wrong, this thread should not be closed yet.

> If people want to sort out what their personal points of view on what
> GNOME should be, I would suggest them to follow up that discussion in
> private and not in this list anymore.
> 
> If people want to contribute to a strategic roadmap for GNOME, I think
> we all would welcome anyone coming up with a compelling set of goals
> and start working on action items to execute that vision and do so in
> the respective channels (marketing list to name an example).
> 
> Talking forever about what GNOME should be and expecting for someone
> to follow that direction is not going to effectively change anything.

Sure it does.

> Thank you.


Cheers,


Philip

-- 
Philip Van Hoof, freelance software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://pvanhoof.be/blog
http://codeminded.be