Re: Can we improve things?
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Can we improve things?
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:35:33 +0200
Le mercredi 12 septembre 2007, à 14:27 +0200, Julien PUYDT a écrit :
> Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > + a few people are trying to fix the current process by writing the
> > software needed (for NewAccounts, but I imagine it could be extended
> > for things like planet). Maybe help is needed to get things ready
> > (and maybe not), but nobody proposed to help :/
>
> Ah, if you're talking about writing software, you're hitting the soft
> spot : quite a few of us have knowledge about doing exactly that.
> Perhaps an explanation about what is needed and what has already been
> done could help there.
I can't tell what is needed since I'm not involved :-) I've just watched
the progress every now and then, since the recent progress were done as
part of the last SoC. So if help is needed, I hope it will be requested.
But again, maybe no help is needed for this specific issue?
<off-topic>
Last time I heard about it, help was still needed for the bugzilla3
migration ;-)
</off-topic>
> > + this should go live soon, as Olav explained (that's why we needed to
> > enforce the new MAINTAINERS format), so maybe we can wait for it to
> > go live and see how it goes before throwing everything.
>
> Could you explain more about the link with the new MAINTAINERS format?
> This looks typically like a "I didn't even know about it -- so I
> couldn't either help or be more comprehensive" case...
The new system works this way:
+ someone requests an account
+ if it's a svn account, it's for at least one specific module. The
maintainers of this module are automatically mailed so they approve
this request. (that's why the new MAINTAINERS format was needed)
+ if maintainers approved a request, a sysadmin validates this and the
account is created.
I thought this was explained on devel-announce-list, but maybe it was
only on desktop-devel-list. Or just IRC :-)
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]