Re: Temporaray enlargement of the GNOME Board with 3 persons
- From: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- To: David Neary <dneary free fr>
- Cc: "Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow taliesin ca>, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Temporaray enlargement of the GNOME Board with 3 persons
- Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:08:39 +0100
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 20:54, David Neary wrote:
> Hi Andrew,...
> No - the referendum last year was non-binding (as mentioned afterwards
> by Dom, I think). The board has the power to decide before the elections
> each year how many seats will be available.
Having only recently had a referendum on this (or at least a closely
related issue, e.g. the size of the Board), I think that if the Board
wants to retain the goodwill and trust of the electorate it should abide
by the referendum results.
A key argument in favor of the "reduce the size of the Board" referendum
was that it would be accompanied by expanded delegation and the
formation of subcommittees/action groups etc. to which tasks would be
delegated by the Board. Let's do it!
Bill
> Cheers,
> Dave.
>
> --
> Dave Neary
> bolsh gimp org
> Lyon, France
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]