Re: Questions for the candidate
- From: Philip Van Hoof <pvanhoof gnome org>
- To: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>
- Cc: Bill Haneman Sun COM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <sayamindu clai net>, Miguel De Icaza <miguel ximian com>, veillard redhat com, foundation-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questions for the candidate
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:17:06 +0100
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 11:44 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-11-30 at 02:06, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > Like Daniel likes to point out, I do not attend every meeting, because
> > unlike other volunteers on the board I have a much more packed agenda
> > and I it is very hard to reconcile it.
> So why did you stand. By your own admission you didn't have time to do
> the job.
However,
The daytime job of people like Miguel often has a great influence on the
GNOME project. Therefor it is my opinion that such individuals are
eligible for being part of a board or part of a decision making team.
Perhaps a less tactical/strategic but more technical (official) team
should be created to complement the current tactical/strategic team.
But honestly has this thread grown to large. Lets now give it in the
hands of the voters and stop the discussion. I fear this is going to
look like a huge flame war sooner or later (if it isn't already).
--
Philip Van Hoof, Software Developer @ Cronos
home: me at freax dot org
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: philip dot vanhoof at cronos dot be
junk: philip dot vanhoof at gmail dot com
http://www.freax.be, http://www.freax.eu.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]