Re: Questions for the candidate

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 06:41:13PM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 06:20:49PM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > I do not have anything against *regular* meetings.
> > 
> > But you can definitely save time by having a lot of cruft removed from
> > the board call, do not confuse the two.
>   Okay, then what precisely do you want to be removed ? 

  As far as I can remember, most of the Board conf call we were both in,
finished within 1 hours after going though all the agenda. Items were
usually not dropped on the floor nor did we took really less than 45mn
to go though them. Maybe there is far less stuff to go though, in 
which case I don't expect "a lot of cruft", or you really considered
some of them to be "cruft" and I really need examples, because it does
not match my recollection.
  Now tell us, what were you not interested into ? There are approved
minutes for 3 years of processing of the board, what was "cruft" in 
your opinion ?


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]