Milan, thank you for taking the time to look at this for me. On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
As far as I can tell, that message is not sent by Evolution. There is a User-Agent header which claims: User-Agent: Kronolith H5 (4.2.16) You begun with "user using also Evolution", thus I guess he/she doesn't use it for calendar invitations.
I have personally watched him use the Evolution interface to generate the invitations in question.
It doesn't matter that much, it was only the most confusing part about your query.
What other parts are confusing?
The message itself has quite complicated structure (Evolution doesn't
send such structures with meeting invitations):
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain
multipart/related
text/html
image/png
text/calendar (name=event-invitation.ics)
application/ics (name=event-invitation.ics)
That's all valid and fine, only your evolution 3.22.6 doesn't handle
it
properly. That had been fixed with [1], which is included in 3.24.0+.
Bye,
Milan
[1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=4213ff83129b
Good to know that newer versions handle this correctly, though it will be some time before most of the user base is at 3.24+. I'm not clear on what the life-cycle of an Evolution release is. Do versions other than current stable get bug fixes? And is your commit referenced above considered a bug fix or a feature addition?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part