Re: [Evolution] attachments issue

On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 12:06 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 17:48 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote:
Am Freitag, den 17.05.2013, 10:52 -0430 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan: 
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 12:15 +0200, Thomas Prost wrote: (probably your own machine) (your local mail server?) (some intermediate relay)
That's all my carrier, whose policy I know ...
That's entirely fortuitous. There's no way in general that you can
predict what sequence of relays a message is going to go through.

?? This is just incorrect.  The relay sequence of a message is
determined primarily by end-point relay hosts and MX records.  The
policy within end-points will be consistent [otherwise that policy is
*insane*] so end-point hosts [sites] can be thought of as a single
multi-component apparatus.  So generally there is only my-end-point and
the-other-end-point.   Communication between those is determined almost
exclusively my MX records - which anyone can query, and change very

Adam Tauno Williams <mailto:awilliam whitemice org> GPG D95ED383
Systems Administrator, Python Developer, LPI / NCLA

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]