Re: [Evolution] Moving from evolution to evolution

[Lailah <lailahfsf gmail com>]

I don't know why, but an upgrade in Ubuntu usually means to erase a lot of things you manually installed, and install a lot of things you manually erased.  Usually all the process download the equivalent of a CD  (600-700MBs)  and break a lot of things during the upgrade.
Usually I rather a clean install, if I have to use Ubuntu.  

For the record:  This and other issues like that made me runaway from Ubuntu and use Fedora.


Kind regards,
Lailah

El dom, 01-07-2012 a las 10:56 -0400, Matthew Barnes escribió: 
> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 07:46 -0700, Mark wrote:
> > With Ubuntu, upgrades are frequently problematic and re-installs work
> > better.  This is as documented by the Ubuntu folks.
>
> That strikes me as odd, Ubuntu being a Debian based distro.
>
> I've been typing "apt-get dist-upgrade" on my stable Debian machine for
> 12 years and can't remember a single upgrade problem.
>
> And I guess I've gotten used to Fedora/RHEL's insistence on using
> Anaconda for upgrades but can't recall having a problem there either.
>
> I'd love to know what's so problematic about Ubuntu upgrades.
>
> Matthew Barnes
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution-list mailing list
> evolution-list gnome org
> To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part