Re: [Evolution] Need some help (I Got IT!!!)

[Tony Earnshaw <tonye billy demon nl>]

ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 16.28 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast:

> > I think you've misunderstood Guenther. He's not slamming Bayesian
> > filters, he's saying there's no need to implement one in the
> > mail client when there are several standalone implementations
> > out there.
>
> while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass
> of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty much moot.

This is the point at which I left this discussion. I honor and respect
Jeff's statement.

For me, Evo will always be Evo. She will continue to sport warts and
blemishes, and I will continue to love her and have to cope with a
multitude of user clients which will include Outlook Express (retch),
Outlook (double retch), Mozilla, Kmail, Eudora, Pegasus, Pine, Mutt,
SquirrelMail and more.

However, as a mailadmin I have to implement, apart from attempted
anti-forgery and other shit, effective site-wide spam and virus
filtering for them all. This I shall continue to do with site-wide
Postfix-proxy-amavisd-new-LDAP-SpamAssassin (which also supports virus
filtering and one hell of a lot more). Everything that any MUA client
supports is purely incidental. As mailadmin for my sites (mostly a gang
of Dutch high schools), I'm ultimately responsible.

--Tonni
 
-- 

mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl