Re: [Evolution] Problem with reply and other stuff (OT)

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 21:26, Tony Earnshaw wrote:

> > I don't understand -- maybe it's just your gratuitous use of HTML making
> > your message appear differently to everything else that doesn't land in
> > the spam bin, and hence causing my limited brain to have difficulty
> > understanding it.
>
>  That's a bit unfair, isn't it? 

What's unfair? Calling my own brain limited or filing HTML in the spam
bin?

The former is indisputably true -- I _did_ find Steven's mail hard to
read because it appeared differently.

The latter is indeed unfair but is my own choice and in fact seems to
have a relatively low rate of false positives (defined as an HTML mail I
actually wanted to read which wasn't exempted on grounds of being in a
mailing list to which I'm subscribed, etc.). I file crap matching
'Subject: Re: ' but having no References: or In-Reply-To: headers to the
spam bin too.

-- 
dwmw2