Re: [Evolution] Problem with reply and other stuff (OT)

[David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>]

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 18:24, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> it only ever makes sense to put the cursor at the bottom if you wanted
> to FORCE people into replying YOUR way (which not everyone agrees with)
> and if the only type of reply anyone EVER wanted to do was a summary
> reply to the whole message (which is clearly not the case).
>
> so even if I were to agree your way was better (which I don't), I'd
> still not change the code to put the cursor at the bottom.

I was suggesting a configuration option so that users who want to
conform to what _is_ the standard practice would be able to do so
easily. Would you not even accept a patch for this if it was offered?
Do you personally make the final decision on such matters?

I assume you know perfectly well that in many fora your top-posted
message containing the complete message to which you were replying, in
violation of RFC1855, would have got you LARTed. :)

-- 
dwmw2