On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:15, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-20 at 11:08, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:Yes, IMAP in 1.2 may be considerably faster for Courier IMAPd.it's faster for presumably every server *except* uw.imapd.Yeah, but still, do we have any idea why uw.imapd would be slower?uw.imapd re-parses the mbox (it uses mbox as the backend) everytime it does anything with the folder. That's just plain slow (and inefficient obviously).
Understood. But then, why would uw.imapd be faster with Evolution 1.0.x? -- Ettore Perazzoli <ettore ximian com>
Description: This is a digitally signed message part