Re: [Evolution-hackers] Nor “Answer to list”, nor “answer to all” make use of “Cc” …add “wide answer”?

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

        Hi,

On Wed, 2018-05-30 at 03:04 +0200, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
> Should we cross-post to evolution-list

Cross-posting is considered bad too. You can just start new
conversation there.

> ...to that private mailing list from the outside, ...

Right, private and public mailing lists can have different rules.

> I didn’t understand… you receive the message then, right?

Yes, but not from the list.

> Though contrarily to Evolution, the later
> differentiate between “To:” and “Cc:” header (Evolution puts
> everything in “To:”

Hmm, as far as I can tell, Evolution preserves the CC header content.

> and all the rest (that were in the “To:”, “Cc:” and “Bcc:”) in the
> “Cc:”.

I do not agree, there is a reason why there are people in Bcc. They
should not be exposed in To or CC.

> What’s the difference between Group Reply, Reply to all and Reply to
> list then?

You can configure what Group Reply does, according to your
preferences/habits.

> Alternative Reply?

Right, it's part of the development version. To be released in 3.30.0+.

> “Complicated” doesn’t mean complete, complex or big, and “Evolution”
> may metonymically refers to its UI as well.

There had been a criticism that the menus are too long already. I refer
just to that.

        Bye,
        Milan