Re: community input..
- From: Umang Jain <mailumangjain gmail com>
- To: Christian Hergert <christian hergert me>
- Cc: Emily Gonyer <emilyyrose gmail com>, Link Dupont <link sub-pop net>, marketing-list <engagement-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: community input..
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:35:57 +0530
Great blog post Christian. I completely agree that people(or new
contributors) take a threshold of time and contributions to the
realize the scale of GNOME; And that they are part of something
bigger. I think this aspect should be clearly spoken out and let the
existing/future contributors know that it's serves as a
career-accelerator and long-term skill building.
So, based on categorization in your post, I think there is lot of
scope to improve this : https://www.gnome.org/get-involved/
Ironing out few more specific details about these roles and how it
applies to GNOME will be great addition to the get-involved page.
Cheers,
uajain
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Christian Hergert <christian hergert me> wrote:
On 12/08/2017 09:58 PM, Christian Hergert wrote:
On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Link Dupont <link sub-pop net> wrote:
> Could we run an experiment on a specific project and see how it goes?
> For example with Builder, what function do you feel is lacking the
> most?
I tried to formalize my thoughts a bit more coherently.
https://blogs.gnome.org/chergert/2017/12/11/developing-skills-with-gnome/
-- Christian
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]