Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup
- From: Dave Neary <dneary gnome org>
- To: Sebastian Pölsterl <sebp k-d-w org>
- Cc: Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:41:57 +0200
Sebastian Pölsterl wrote:
> Am 18.05.2011 19:21, schrieb Michael Terry:
>> And also, does being in git imply that the translation team would
>> automatically consider the module?
>>
> Not automatically, you have to be added[1] to l10n.gnome.org
>
> [1]:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=damned-lies&component=l10n.gnome.org
Interesting!
Is the GNOME l10n team following & translating any modules using Rosetta
or Transifex at the moment? How hard would it be to add a module using
one of those to Damned Lies?
In general I'm interested in how dogmatic the "use GNOME infrastructure"
requirement is, in the case of each team what the reasons & motivations
are, and how we can integrate personal preferences of module maintainers
& translators for things like bug trackers & translation infrastructure
(in the same way that git2svn allowed developers to commit to git for
GNOME modules, even before GNOME had migrated).
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
dneary gnome org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]