Re: Metacity Compositor
- From: JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
- To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Metacity Compositor
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 19:23:16 -0400
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 18:53 -0400, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> <quote who="Daniel Borgmann">
>
> > Is there really any objective reason why Compiz shouldn't be at least
> > considered as a potential successor to Metacity?
>
> Because it does not benefit from a long history of development, testing and
> fixes for crucial window management behaviour, and gives everyone terrible,
> vomitous flashbacks to Sawfish configuration (those who don't feel ill have
> not learned from history, and are doomed to repeat it).
I'm not sure how lisp like configuration equates with something that
exposes all its settings in gconf and has a dbus plugin for remote
control. gnome-xgl is a settings gui that is fairly generic (except for
enabling Xgl on suse), although it could use a little UI love.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <jpr novell com>
Novell, Inc.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]