Re: gtk 2.8 for gnome 2.12

[Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>]

On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:20 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote:
> There could or could not be significant issues in 2.7.  The point is its
> not certain and it introduces significant *risk* to the schedule.  We
> went through the same thing with 2.6 and it seems we learned nothing,
> see your own original view:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-June/msg00020.html
> 
> As well as Andrew's:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2005-June/msg00022.html

Just for reference, the main differences between 2.6 and 2.8 are their
stability and completeness *at this point* in the release cycle - ie.
the point at which we are committing to one. 2.8 appears to be more
stable and complete than 2.6 was.
-- 
Andrew