Re: 'Delete' v. 'Move to trash'
- From: Andrew Conkling <andrewski fr st>
- To: Balsa list <balsa-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: 'Delete' v. 'Move to trash'
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 05:19:04 +0000
On 08/01/05 11:55:59, Craig Routledge wrote:
On 01/08/2005 04:31:44 AM, Pawel Salek wrote:
On 01/08/2005 04:43:00 AM, Craig Routledge wrote:
I think this
whole idea of two different ways of "deleting" messages is prone to
causing some confusion.
Yes, you are right in your analysis. Another difference between real
(move-to-trash) and virtual (mark-as-deleted) trash models is that
virtual trash folders are easiest to expunge on mailbox close: making
them expunge messages on balsa exit may require opening them again,
which may be time-consuming.
What I would like to know is whether such an idea is not too radical: I
mean would it not be a too big shock for a person who has just switched
from another program? For a complete beginner? I cannot tell myself.
If the virtual Trash shows up as a folder, just like the others,
beginners probably won't even notice. People can either unhide deleted
messages in their normal mailboxes or look in the trash. Either way, we
have just one delete method which should simplify both the interface and
Sounds good in theory anyways. I'm probably not the best judge of
people's expectations either.
I think this sounds like a good solution. That would provide me with what
I was hoping for all along (just a simple keystroke!) but would also
provide many different types of users with good performance and not too
many unexpected behaviours. Anything more complicated might confuse me, at
] [Thread Prev