Re: [anjuta-devel] Rethinking the AnjutaProjectNode API

[Abderrahim Kitouni <a kitouni gmail com>]

Hello Sébastien,

              في ج، 19-08-2011 عند 19:13 +0200 ، كتب Sébastien Granjoux:
> > One more thing: I noticed that VALAFLAGS isn't in the properties for a
> > group (only AM_VALAFLAGS).
>
> It's the same for all flags properties. I think that in project files 
> you are supposed to modify AM_*FLAGS variable only. The *FLAGS are 
> reserved for changes at build time.
>
> Then, I'm wondering if it is not better to use VALAFLAGS, CFLAGS... as 
> id because it would be useful to have the same id whatever is the 
> project backend. I suppose that this isn't called AM_CFLAGS in a CMake 
> project but probably the same mechanism is existing.

I chose to call them AM_* because I thought that you just forgot the
unprefixed versions. If you don't plan to support them, then I think
it's better to remove the AM_ prefix.

Should I fix them, or will you take care of them?

Regards,
Abderrahim