Re: [anjuta-devel] Rethinking the AnjutaProjectNode API

[Abderrahim Kitouni <a kitouni gmail com>]

في ر، 17-08-2011 عند 19:56 +0200 ، كتب Sébastien Granjoux:

> > I think a string is better when you think about high level languages:
> > the address of a constant + pointer comparison is (Ok in C; hackish in
> > Vala; impossible in Python) while string comparison is (cumbersome in C;
> > Ok in Vala; Ok in Python).
>
> I have expected a bit such answer :). We could have an enumerate value 
> instead but I'm afraid it will be a bit annoying to allocate values.

I thought about this as well, but 

> > I'll try to write a patch for this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656915

I tried to use the same name for the same AM thing, but I noticed some
inconsistencies: LIBADD is once "Libraries:" and once "Additional
libraries:" and LDADD is once "Additional objects:" and once
"Libraries:"

One more thing: I noticed that VALAFLAGS isn't in the properties for a
group (only AM_VALAFLAGS).

Regards,
Abderrahim