Re: [xml] redicting parts of trees

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 09:23:43AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
> Ok, just changing my response now as I just noticed it was committed 2 
> hours ago.
>
> Personally with an imminent release would have liked to wait until after 
> the release for the code to be added especially since a discussion was 
> held off. My little free time right now has been spent testing the 
> upcoming release against PHP seeing as PHP 5.1 is also in beta release, 
> so havent had much time to look at new functionality of this scale. Wont 
> setting the context structure prior to this release pretty much set it 
> in stone or end up causing BC breakage with the next release?

  I am the one who suggested to Kasimier to push to CVs precisely
to get testing, but labelling it as experimental. I think we can grow the
structure fairly reasilly in the future. Are you afraid of PHP-5.2 compiled
against a vertion of libxml2 post 2.6.20 and running with 2.6.20 and hence
a limited context ? If this is the case we can arbitrarily put a function
pointer in the lot and a couple more int and data pointers for good measure
and feel safe about it.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/