Re: [xml] redicting parts of trees

[Rob Richards <rrichards ctindustries net>]

Ok, just changing my response now as I just noticed it was committed 2 
hours ago.

Personally with an imminent release would have liked to wait until after 
the release for the code to be added especially since a discussion was 
held off. My little free time right now has been spent testing the 
upcoming release against PHP seeing as PHP 5.1 is also in beta release, 
so havent had much time to look at new functionality of this scale. Wont 
setting the context structure prior to this release pretty much set it 
in stone or end up causing BC breakage with the next release?

But some comments on your message:

Context naming is along the lines I was going to suggest.

As for context I know I would need something along the following lines 
(cant be more specific yet as I would really need time to implement it 
to make sure):

scenaio: adopt node

functionality I need to perform:
a function needs to be called passing in the node as well as the new doc.

reason:
The _priv needs to be accessed and references to old doc need to be 
removed as a ref count is kept to old doc.
then it needs to update pointers and refcounts for the new doc.

Rob

Kasimier Buchcik wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:41 +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
>  
>
> > Hi,
> >    
>
> Daniel wants to make a release soon, so I need quick suggestions for
> the name of the custom context struct :-) We are adding the new
> functions to this release. It should be used with a yet-to-write
> copy-node function as well, so the name should not be too specific.
> And please don't try to integrate your initials into the name ;-)
>