Re: [Setup-tool-hackers] Archiver

[Bradford Hovinen <hovinen helixcode com>]

On 09 Jan 2001 01:48:18 +0100, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > That's ok in principle, and I can see it being used for things like
> > putting backends under the management of a location or the opposite. I
> > have a couple of small reservations about the effect that that would
> > have on the interface I proposed in a message I sent earlier -- that
> > interface really lends itself to a more active configuration system.
> 
> Yes. The switch-driven backend (the one you've already made) would be the one
> communicating with the frontend, then. Or will you use the archiver library
> directly?

Right now it's using the archiver library directly, but that will have
to change soon in order to allow the user to control the hst backends
from the Control Center.

> 
> --
> Hans Petter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Setup-tool-hackers maillist  -  Setup-tool-hackers@helixcode.com
> http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/setup-tool-hackers



-- 
-Bradford Hovinen

We are most probably here for local information-gathering and
local-Universe problem-solving in support of the integrity of
eternally regenerative Universe.

   -- R. Buckminster Fuller