Re: [Setup-tool-hackers] Archiver

[Hans Petter Jansson <hpj helixcode com>]

> That's ok in principle, and I can see it being used for things like
> putting backends under the management of a location or the opposite. I
> have a couple of small reservations about the effect that that would
> have on the interface I proposed in a message I sent earlier -- that
> interface really lends itself to a more active configuration system.

Yes. The switch-driven backend (the one you've already made) would be the one
communicating with the frontend, then. Or will you use the archiver library
directly?

--
Hans Petter