Re: Sawfish 1.8.0 and Fedora

> 	However, I think it would still be interesting to put Sawfish
> into Fedora (and EPEL).

Yes, it would. If you have extra time please try to do it.

> 	I have briefly looked into the sawfish .spec file, and there
> is a minor flaw which my own .spec file does not have:
> Requires: librep >= 0.91.0, rep-gtk >= 0.90.4
> - apparently, sawfish requires also librep-devel.

I just tested it. Sawfish works fine without librep-devel and
rep-gtk-devel. Perhaps your version of librep.spec had some file listed
to wrong subpackage?

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]