Re: [sabayon] =?utf-8?q?=5BPatch_Nag=5D_Bug_346890_=E2=80=93_Please_u?= =?utf-8?q?pdate_to_latest_Pessulus_tree?=
- From: "Sayamindu Dasgupta" <sayamindu randomink org>
- To: "Federico Mena Quintero" <federico ximian com>
- Cc: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, sabayon-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [sabayon] [Patch Nag] Bug 346890 – Please update to latest Pessulus tree
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 13:13:21 +0530
On 1/23/07, Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com> wrote:
El mié, 17-01-2007 a las 11:33 +0100, Vincent Untz escribió:
> We discussed about this with Alex in the past. The main reason that we
> have two modules is that I know some people were using pessulus only and
> really didn't need sabayon.
>
> We can of course have sabayon depend on the system installation of
> pessulus. Another solution could be to have the sabayon module provide
> the two tools: sabayon with included pessulus, and standalone pessulus.
>
> I don't care that much about the way we solve this, but it's quite
> important, IMHO, that we keep a standalone pessulus.
OK :)
<embrace-and-extend>
What do we need to move Pessulus into the Sabayon source tree for good,
and yet be able to run Pessulus standalone?
</embrace-and-extend>
Maybe have a seperate Python executable which launches Pessulus on its
own (it's the same as the thing being done in the existing Pessulus
tree).
I've started a tentative to-do list for this (scroll down the page):
http://live.gnome.org/Sabayon
Who wants to take care of this? :)
Me :-)
(Once I get back home at India, since I don't have very stable
Internet access here at Indonesia)
I'll also probably poke the sysadmins once more for an SVN account.
-sdg-
--
Sayamindu Dasgupta
[http://sayamindu.randomink.org/ramblings]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]