Re: [sabayon] =?utf-8?q?=5BPatch_Nag=5D_Bug_346890_=E2=80=93_Please_u?= =?utf-8?q?pdate_to_latest_Pessulus_tree?=

On 1/23/07, Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com> wrote:
El mié, 17-01-2007 a las 11:33 +0100, Vincent Untz escribió:

> We discussed about this with Alex in the past. The main reason that we
> have two modules is that I know some people were using pessulus only and
> really didn't need sabayon.
> We can of course have sabayon depend on the system installation of
> pessulus. Another solution could be to have the sabayon module provide
> the two tools: sabayon with included pessulus, and standalone pessulus.
> I don't care that much about the way we solve this, but it's quite
> important, IMHO, that we keep a standalone pessulus.

OK :)

What do we need to move Pessulus into the Sabayon source tree for good,
and yet be able to run Pessulus standalone?

Maybe have a seperate Python executable which launches Pessulus on its
own (it's the same as the thing being done in the existing Pessulus

I've started a tentative to-do list for this (scroll down the page):

Who wants to take care of this? :)

Me :-)
(Once I get back home at India, since I don't have very stable
Internet access here at Indonesia)
I'll also probably poke the sysadmins once more for an SVN account.


Sayamindu Dasgupta

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]