Re: [sabayon] =?windows-1251?q?=5BPatch_Nag=5D_Bug_346890_=96_=09Plea?= =?windows-1251?q?se=09update_to_latest_Pessulus_tree?=

El vie, 12-01-2007 a las 10:55 +0100, Alexander Larsson escribi� On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 20:19 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> > El mi�10-01-2007 a las 21:55 +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta escribi� > 
> > > Probably Sabayon should be using the system installation of Pessulus
> > > for handling lockdown. I have attached a pretty trivial to
> > > which does this. Of
> > > course, this makes Sabayon depend on Pessulus, but I think that's OK.
> > 
> > Thanks!  I just commented on the bug.  I think Sabayon and Pessulus
> > should live in the same source tree, and not be separate modules at all.
> > But maybe there are good reasons for this; does anyone know?
> Two separate developer teams wrote two separate modules separately.
> Thats the history. Could it change? Thats up to the developers.

CCing Vincent Untz and Rob Bradford.

What do you think of merging Pessulus to live directly under the Sabayon
source tree?  I think we'd be able to hack on them better that way.

[Does anyone know how to move stuff across subversion modules?]


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]