Re: [orca-list] Antergos the next Arch alternative which works

["B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>]

I never said that chrome was faster, and did not read any other msg saying it was. 
There was a time when chromium did have issues re accessiblity that chrome did not, and for that matter there 
was a time, wayu back when, when only the dev 
branch of chromium worked with some screen readers, chrome did not work at all then, nor did stable chromium 
for that matter; but that was 5 years ago more 
or less.



-- 
     B.H.
   Registerd Linux User 521886


  Kyle wrote:
Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 07:40:39PM -0500

> I'm not sure how Chrome could be faster than Chromium, since they have the
> same codebase. Nothing is in Chrome that isn't in Chromium, except some
> proprietary stuff that is integrated into Chrome, but is available as
> plugins for Chromium. There is nothing in Chrome that changes its overall
> behavior in any way as compared to Chromium.
> Sent from my melody cool
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org