Re: [orca-list] Antergos the next Arch alternative which works

["B. Henry" <burt1iband gmail com>]

Get chrome, not chromium
It's not a better browser, does not work with speech-dispatcher reliably, but does at times, but using 
chromevox, not orca.
It is very good to havew as an alternativ e though, and does work better on an occasiional site than does 
firefox.
Some of the menus and other interface bits are rather different, and perhaps less intuitive for those used to 
firefox, and some other browsers.
I always put chrome with the chromevox extension so it speaks on my Linux machines, but use it much less than 
firefox.
Some of the same ppl who make firefox extensions make versions for chrome, but at times they look and or act 
a bit differently. There's no webvisum for 
chrome or chromium. 
As for the flash version, it does not correspond. 
I don't know of flash working better with chrome than with other Linux browsers, but can't say for sure if 
it's better worse, or mostly the same as 
fortunately I don't have to use much flash these days, and don't remember the last time I had trouble with 
flash with firefox.
   


-- 
     B.H.
   Registerd Linux User 521886


  Doug Smith wrote:
Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 08:29:40PM +0100

> Ok, I just got this running and I don't have it installed yet.  The only thing I can find that causes any 
> problem for me is chromium.  How do I get the totally silent web browser to speak and how do I use 
> chromium?  Is it similar to firefox.  I see that it is using a later version of flash and I wonder if it is 
> a better browser than firefox.  
>
>
>
> Thanks. 
>
>
>
> > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 at 2:12 PM
> > From: Kyle <kyle4jesus gmail com>
> > To: orca-list gnome org
> > Subject: Re: [orca-list] Antergos the next Arch alternative which works
> >
> > You're right Luke. Antergos uses an installer called Cnchi, which 
> > Manjaro's Thus was forked from initially. Since Cnchi is still in 
> > development for Antergos, it can either be forked again and ported over 
> > to Manjaro or patched for Antergos to get rid of the last accessibility 
> > bugs. It will certainly be easier than writing a new Arch installer from 
> > scratch, or even writing a graphical component for something like AUI. 
> > Personally, my vote is for trying to patch away the accessibility bugs 
> > in Cnchi as it is in Antergos, because Antergos, rather than being a 
> > complete fork of Arch, starts with pure Arch and just adds its own 
> > minimal repository, which could actually be removed to make an Antergos 
> > system a pure Arch system if desired by the user.
> > Sent from computer blue
> > _______________________________________________
> > orca-list mailing list
> > orca-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> > Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> > Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> > GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> > Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
> _______________________________________________
> orca-list mailing list
> orca-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
> Orca wiki: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Orca
> Orca documentation: https://help.gnome.org/users/orca/stable/
> GNOME Universal Access guide: https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/stable/a11y.html
> Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org