GNOME.org
 

Re: [orca-list] Accessibility of LXDE desktop?

You'd probably have to make it yourself. If I were going to undertake that I'd start with a Debian netinstall 
cd, install a barebones, minimal installation with just CLI and speakup and then go into aptitude to disable 
autoinstall of suggested and recommended packages.  I would then install Mate or Fluxbox with Burt's 
configuration suggestions or, look into what's needed to get XFCE going with the minimum possible needed 
packages.  I'd then do whatever it is the distro has you do to make a live cd out of your environment.  Even 
with all this, I'd be immensely surprised if you wound up with something under 500 mb.  

All in all, the entire thing has all the hallmarks of being an all-day, deskpounding, four-letter-word-filled 
ordeal.  I'm exhausted just explaining it!  *grin* I can't imagine why I'd put myself to all that trouble 
when I can just grab just about any Fedora, Ubuntu or  Debian cd or dvd and get it talking with super alt s.  
Once I do that, it's a simple matter to get to a terminal, mount my hard drive and do what needs doing with 
all the utilities most distros come with standard.  I'd save oodles of time and frustration reinventing the 
wheel, get what I needed to get done, put my cd or dvd back in my drawer and go on about my business.  These 
days, one doesn't seem to need to go to all the trouble that was once needed to get a talking environment out 
of a mainstream live cd.  

Alex M

-----Original Message-----
From: orca-list [mailto:orca-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of Alex H.
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 7:17 PM
To: B. Henry
Cc: orca-list gnome org
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Accessibility of LXDE desktop?

Yeah, but can someone just make a sort of bigger version of DSL that has CLI and GUI and doesn't suffer from 
bloat and ... vinuxyishness?
500megs or less, orca, whatever the litest GUI thing that works w/Orca, no neckbearding needed? Thinking of a 
small rescue disk that's primarily CLI and not GRML.

On 8/16/14, B. Henry <burt1iband gmail com> wrote:

It is not that hard to make a custom installer once you have 
configured things as you like, e.g. installed fluxbox and its 
dependencies. You can switch from one desktop to another assuming 
sonar has an accessible DM, and it'd be pretty easy to set up as to 
get the nicest accessible fluxbox I know of several mate packages and 
their deps are installed.
I use caja to get me a orca readable desktop for instance, and caja is 
mate's default file manager.
I use pcmanfm as my file manager because of its superior performance, 
better than windows xp's filemanager, windows explorer I think it's 
called. That is lxde's default file manager, but you want the version 
from git, pcmanfm-git I'm pretty sure it is called on arch/manjaro.
I know it is a bit scarey for some people to think about the 
configuration required to get all of this working well, but it is 
actually pretty easy, and I can give you very specific instructions if 
you want to go this route.

Hopefully with in a few months I'll have a screenreader friendly 
fluxbox setup in the Arch-Linux AUR, so with something like packer or 
yaourt you will be able to install everything with a single 
pacman-like command, i.e.
pacman -Syu
and then
packer -S what-ever-I-call-the-package No help today, but something to 
look forward to.
Storm already hs ratpoison accessibility stuff packaged, so you only 
need to add the accessibility variable export stuff and run a couple 
of commands to get things screenreader friendly, see his email in this 
thread regarding this.
Unless you are very memory tight Mate should be plently light, and it 
is enough more accessible compared with lxde to make it a much better 
choice if you can run it.
XFCE is about as accessible as lxde, maybe a bit better actually, (not 
tried lxde recently to say for sure), and on most systems uses less 
memory than mate, but as far as cpu goes there's no big advantage 
either way.
At least one person, maybe a significant minority of users, report 
using less ram with mate than they do with XFCE. All I read however, 
and personal experience tell me that xfce's lighter on memory usage 
than Mate.
As they often say, "your mileage maly vary,"...
--
B.H.


On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:28:35PM +0430, Hadi Rezaee wrote:

I wish there was a distro, (based on manjaro) that had a very 
lighweight desktop manager. Extremeley lightweight with minimum 
packages, so i could boot it from my USB flash and take it with me around.
Sonar apparently is working on a mate-based distro, But i know many 
lighter desktops also exists.

On 8/16/2014 10:47 PM, B. Henry wrote:

Thanks for sharing the link.
More later, but quickly, although the menu's not accessible in 
fluxbox,  there is no menu at all for rat-poison.
In either one though, as mentioned in my prev post in this thread, 
you  can make a shortcut to open a filemanager in 
/usr/share/applications/ and pressing enter on the .desktop files in 
there will launch the  programs they refference in their exec lines. 
Usually the program has same name as the .desktop file, but not 
always.
I have used this technique in flluxbox with the super, (windowskey 
to  some), plus a as the shortcut.
The line in my ~/.fluxbox/keys file reading:
Mod4 a :Exec pcmanfm /usr/share/applications/ Note that Mod4 is what 
the windows or super key is called by many *nix  configuration 
files, and Mod1 is alt.
Ratpoison has a keybinding to show you all the hotkeys that are  
configured, so in a sense this is a app menu substitute.

The big drawback to ratpoison for me is the two key combination  
keybindings.
As Storm says, it's like screen, or emacs if you wish, i.e. 
control-t  plus something instead of having Control-m do something.
I find it rather inconvenient and just plain rhythm destroying to 
have to  press two key combinations to launch programs, show the 
desktop or what ever instead of just typi9ing one combiinationm,  
e.g. alt super m to launch mangler, alt super w to launch my default 
x-www-browser, etc.
For others this would not be a bother, or not much of one.
Both window managers are very fast, small, and thrifty with system  
resources in general.
Ratpoison's even smaller/lighter than fluxbox, but not noticeablly 
faster  here. They both have atractive features and are quite 
stable. I do find fluxbox more flexible, and generally more feature  
rich, but there's plenty good to say about ratpoison.
Again, more later.
Oh, you can make a .sh file in /etc/profile.d/ and put the 
GTK_MODULES  line in it, andf same with the QT setting, but in a 
file called qt-accessibility.sh. Having those files should mean that 
any  user will have the access stuff for these kits working, and if 
you use a dm that doesn't use .xinitrc file in your home  dir you
--
B.H.

On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:55:16AM -0400, Storm Dragon wrote:

Hi,
this is still very much a work in progress. It's designed to 
replace the  inaccessible bits of ratpoison, which is about as fast 
as you can get  and still have access to X.
git clone https://github.com/stormdragon2976/strychnine.git
You'll have to point to the items in the git directiory in your  
.ratpoisonrc or add them to fluxbox. If you absolutely have to have 
a  desktop, you can install caja and add caja -n to the .ratpoisonrc.
Ratpoison works a lot like screen, I find it very easy to use. 
Fluxbox  was pretty cool too, but the menu isn't accessible, which 
is a bit of a  drawback. In ratpoison, if you need a tray for apps 
that only work if  there's a panel or tray present, try trayer. I 
only have one app that  requires it, and it's a QT app, so I'm not sure how accessible it is.
It does say panel when focus lands on it though, so maybe...
If you're setting up mate, fluxbox, or ratpoison, here's a quick  
reference of things you will want to do to make the best accessible  
experience. Note these instructions work on Arch Linux. I'm not 
sure  where .xinitrc is on other distros like Ubuntu or Vinux.
In ~/.xinitrc, make sure you have the line:
export GTK_MODULES=gail:atk-bridge

In your ~/.bashrc:
export QT_ACCESSIBILITY=1

In terminal type:
gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.a11y.applications 
screen-reader-enabled  true

And finally, if you chose Mate:
gsettings set org.mate.interface accessibility true

HTH
Storm
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:23:57AM -0500, Burt Henry wrote:

no panels, can't remember about desktop icons.
Mate is a lot heavier than lxde, but light compared with unity or 
kde,  and much cpu less intensive than gnome3 and very accessible 
with a few glitches.
XFCE may be a bit better than lxde, but very similar, and if you 
can do  with out accessible panels and can do with out an 
organized apps menu you can go super lightweight with fluxbox.
In fluxbox assign keuyboard shortcuts to the programs you use 
most,  launch caja to get desktop icons, (use the -n option when 
auto starting it in the fluxbox start-up file), and assign a key  
to open the applications dir in /usr/share to get a way to launch 
any app you don't have a shortcut for and do not remember  exact 
name for.
Also Stormdragon wrote a little  script to replace the run box app  
that's not accessible for fluxbox, ratpoison and similar. I don't 
have his original, but do have my slightly hacked  version of this 
I can send, or look in archives for the url to get his version. 
Build from source if not able to get latest  fluxbox on your 
debian based distro, it's in repos for arch.
I can help more with the fluxbox configuration if you are 
interested,  and maybe it'll get better out of the box with in a 
reasonable time frame, some dev interest.
OAll of the above mentioned options require exporting gtk modules 
and  setting qt accessiblity at least as well as a couple things 
for gconf  for mate anyway, same gets stuff working for  fluxbox.
I can send you some links and or notes later if you need.
--
B.H.

There are a couple more hacks for fluxbox.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 08:06:43AM -0700, austinAustin quesada wrote:

Hi list. Was just wondering if the light-weight LXDE environment 
is accessible using orca? I have some older machines laying 
around that might benefit from a debian or arch install with 
LXDE. If it's not particularly accessible, could anyone advise on 
another light-weight desktop? Thanks for any feedback.
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at

http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.h
tml The FAQ is at 
http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find 
out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp




_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at

http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.ht
ml The FAQ is at 
http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find 
out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp


--
Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465:
https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html
My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my 
public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key
43DDC193
Follow me on Pump.io: http://microca.st/stormdragon2976 "It's not 
our aim to hum, to aspirate, to perish tardily. It's our goal  to 
be, and to become, and to rise constantly."
Van Canto - Quest for Roar




_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at

http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.htm
l The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out 
how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp

_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at

http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out 
how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp


_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out 
how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp

_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out 
how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp


_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out how to help at 
http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]