Re: [orca-list] keys in conflict with XUL application keys
- From: Milan Zamazal <pdm brailcom org>
- To: Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM>
- Cc: Joanmarie Diggs <joanmarie diggs gmail com>, orca-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] keys in conflict with XUL application keys
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:05:07 +0200
"WW" == Willie Walker <William Walker Sun COM> writes:
>> Ah, gotcha. I was under the impression that the alphanumeric
>> keys would not be bound to UI elements without being combined
>> with some other modifier. For instance, I assumed the
>> possibility of Alt+B or Control+B but not just B (or for that
>> matter Shift+B). Although I guess Thunderbird does stuff like
>> that -- and each time I accidentally do something to trigger it,
>> I find it disturbing/bad design. ;-)
WW> I agree that it is bad design and content providers should not
WW> do this.
I disagree. For instance Emacs applications (Emacs environment can be
comparable to XUL environment for the purpose), including Web browsers,
commonly bind alphanumeric keys to commands. And the Firefox extension
I use for web browsing, Conkeror, uses global and UI element
alphanumeric key bindings too. In all the cases I would get pretty
annoyed if I had to use modifiers when invoking common commands. There
is no reason to force users to press modifiers on each common operation.
Regards,
Milan Zamazal
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]