Re: SMS sending error with Telit module

[Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>]

On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 09:54 +0200, Enrico Murador - Research &
Development - CET wrote:
> Ok. Problem is that I think I can't get more information regarding 
> Windows drivers (even if I manage to get the sources, I suppose I can't 
> freely publish the content). Now I'm trying to look for anything useful 
> in the list of available AT commands.
> Probably I'll have to stick with info that I already have... that should 
> not be a problem, if I could "patch" (maybe writing udev rules by 
> myself?) MM to work with my model only.
> I agree that a more complete solution is the way to go, but now I have a 
> system that is essentially not working, so one "half" solution would be 
> better than nothing.
>
> So, how can I do? Is there a way for me to "customize" MM port detection 
> for my UC864E module?

I've pushed a dcbw/telit-plugin branch that includes the appropriate
udev rules, and a first attempt at access technology checking based on
some Telit documentation that I found.  Is there a chance you can try
this branch and see if it works reliably for your device?

Dan

> Last resort would be to "turn off" MM and manually handle the module 
> (and the related data connection), but I must also manage a VPN on that 
> connection, and I think NetworkManager doesn't consider data connections 
> that are not managed by itself, so in the case I'll also have to 
> manually handle the VPN connection...
>
> Thank you
>
> On 16/04/2013 19:10, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 18:23 +0200, Enrico Murador - Research &
> > Development - CET wrote:
> > > On 16/04/2013 17:32, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > What are the USB IDs again?
> > > Do you mean VID and PID? If so:
> > >
> > > #define TELIT_VENDOR_ID                         0x1bc7
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_UC864E                    0x1003
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_UC864G                    0x1004
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_CC864_DUAL                0x1005
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_CC864_SINGLE              0x1006
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_DE910_DUAL                0x1010
> > > #define TELIT_PRODUCT_LE920                     0x1200
> > Based on the PDF, we'll need a couple of classes of rules because these
> > devices have different USB layouts.  For example, the 910 and 920 have
> > different layouts, and the auxiliary port number is different between
> > the 864E and 864G.  Even the CC864-SINGLE is different than the
> > CC864-DUAL.  But this is easy to handle with udev rules.
> >
> > Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> networkmanager-list mailing list
> networkmanager-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list