On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 15:24 +0100, Mark Haack wrote: > Hi > > here is a live sample from Berlin. > Huawei K3520 data stick + Base SIM. As you can see MVNO Base is not shown in > broadband info (E-Plus) <snip> > at+cops? > > +COPS: 0,0,"BASE DE",2 > OK This is exactly what I want to see. You have bought your SIM card from "Base" operator which happens to be a MVNO of E-Plus, right? If this is consistent over different devices we could augment the entry for Base in the database with network-name "BASE DE". If you get "E-Plus" with some equipment, then guessing with this augmentation will fail. I would really like to see some results with other GSM devices (not Nokia!) with the same SIM card. If you have access to any could you please test with other devices, too? > +COPS: > (2,"E-Plus","E-Plus","26203",2),(1,"E-Plus","E-Plus","26203",0),(3,"T-Mobile > D","TMO D","26201",2),(3,"T-Mobile D","TMO D","26201",0),(3,"o2 - de","o2 - > de","26207",0),(3,"Vodafone.de","","26202",0),(3,"o2 - de","o2 - > de","26207",2),(3,"Vodafone.de","","26202",2),,(0,1,2,3,4),(0,1,2) OK, so +cops=? shows the real network owner in this particular case and it's different from +cops? output. If we can solely use the output of +cops? then this doesn't matter. No one wants to use the +cops=? anyway as it's too slow :) -- Antti
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part