On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 11:41 +0200, Antti Kaijanmäki wrote:
> In this situation we simply have a miss in database search and user is
> presented with all the available configuration choices. Can you provide
> some real life example where the long alphabetical form is misleading
> and would cause selecting wrong operator? At least the devices I've
> tested return reliable results, but they are so few that I can't claim
> anything based on those.
Actually it would be nice to have other people testing this, too. If
someone wants to help, just take your devices and SIM-cards and post the
results. For example with cu:
connect to the modem:
cu -s 115200 -l /dev/ttyXXX
enter pin code:
at+cpin="****"
get network code:
at+cops=0,2
at+cops?
get the name:
at+cops=0,0
at+cops?
exit:
~.
Execute the above procedure with GSM equipment and SIM cards available
to you and post the results of network code and name here and tell if
the name doesn't match your provider or if it changes with different
devices.
-- Antti
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part