Re: Network Manager patched on Ubuntu Karmic 9.10



On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:38 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 08:59 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 16:17 -0500, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> Dan Williams wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> >>>>>> Hey, Dan!
> >>>>>> Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the community to
> >>>>>> solve the problem, but the bug had been reported to launchpad with
> >>>>>> like a dozen duplicates. The daily builds were suggested as partial
> >>>>>> fix but since then I could get no information from anywhere and bug
> >>>>>> reports on launchpad do not seem to be updated anymore. My friend was
> >>>>>> asking me whether he should install Karmic and I couldn't say "yes",
> >>>>>> since if his first GNU/Linux experience would be like that, I think
> >>>>>> this would not be a good thing. So eventually I decided to contact
> >>>>>> this mailing list directly, so that I can get some firsthand
> >>>>>> information.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My dream would be to get a new version of NM. Uninstall this one,
> >>>>>> install this one and have it work normally like it did in 9.04 %) All
> >>>>>> apps get bugs like this one sometimes - I am not complaining. I just
> >>>>>> want to know if something is being done and if yes - when is a total
> >>>>>> fix planned? To me it is a serious blocker.
> >>>>> You can't realize that dream until we get some help in debugging the
> >>>>> issue so that we can fix the problem.  We also can't do anything until
> >>>>> users help us debug the problem by answering the questions that I've
> >>>>> asked.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dan
> >>>> I have another one for Karmic, and I can do that as well. I've noticed
> >>>> that there does not seem to be any way to get it to pay any attention to
> >>>> an Ad-Hoc network. When I'm in range, the network appears in the
> >>>> knetworkmanager applet, but if I click on it, nothing happens (much the
> >>>> same as a hidden network did in a case we'd discussed in the past). I'm
> >>>> not sure what the debug info would say, but it should be interesting to
> >>>> find out. It looks like absolutely nothing happens at all.
> >>> Can I get some /var/log/NetworkManager output from that?  Based on that
> >>> we can enable wpa_supplicant debugging and find out from there.
> >> It's daemon.log for me. Looks like this is what happens:
> >>
> >> Nov 18 08:56:19 novosirj-laptop NetworkManager: <WARN>
> >> wait_for_connection_expired(): Connection (2)
> >> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/2 failed to activate (timeout):
> >> (0) Connection was not provided by any settings service
> >> Nov 18 08:56:48 novosirj-laptop NetworkManager: <WARN>
> >> wait_for_connection_expired(): Connection (2)
> >> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/2 failed to activate (timeout):
> >> (0) Connection was not provided by any settings service
> >> Nov 18 08:56:51 novosirj-laptop wpa_supplicant[1256]:
> >> CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
> >> Nov 18 08:56:51 novosirj-laptop wpa_supplicant[1256]: WPS-AP-AVAILABLE
> >> Nov 18 08:57:00 novosirj-laptop NetworkManager: <WARN>
> >> wait_for_connection_expired(): Connection (2)
> >> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/2 failed to activate (timeout):
> >> (0) Connection was not provided by any settings service
> >> Nov 18 08:57:08 novosirj-laptop NetworkManager: <WARN>
> >> wait_for_connection_expired(): Connection (2)
> >> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/2 failed to activate (timeout):
> >> (0) Connection was not provided by any settings service
> >> Nov 18 08:57:20 novosirj-laptop NetworkManager: <WARN>
> >> wait_for_connection_expired(): Connection (2)
> >> /org/freedesktop/NetworkManagerSettings/2 failed to activate (timeout):
> >> (0) Connection was not provided by any settings service
> >>
> >> Each one of those activate timeouts is a result of me clicking the
> >> network and waiting 5-6 seconds. Didn't know to look in that log or I
> >> would have Google'd this one sooner (which I'll do now to see if it gets
> >> me anyplace).
> > 
> > So this log indicates that the applet isn't creating the connection
> > correctly and providing it to NetworkManager after you click the
> > network.  Is this actually knetworkmanager, or is this the KDE4 widget?
> > knetworkmanager itself (the old standalone applet) is no longer
> > developed and only works with NM 0.7.x actually.
> 
> Things are a little confusing in Karmic and I didn't know quite what to
> make of it (I also didn't know a 0.8.0 was ever released, though I guess
> the version number would suggest that it's pre-release). While it
> appears that the previous version (Jaunty, 9.04) used a widget, it seems
> that Karmic uses KNetworkManager. When looking at my packages, I see:
> 
> ii  plasma-widget-network-manager
> 0.9~svn1029786+ag1-0ubuntu1                                Network
> Management widget for KDE4 Plasma
> ii  plasma-widget-networkmanagement
> 0.9~svn1029786+ag1-0ubuntu1                                Network
> Management widget for KDE4 Plasma

Ah, that looks like you're *not* using knetworkmanager, you're using the
new plasma-enabled bits.  So that's good.  I'm talking about the really
old KDE3 'knetworkmanager'.

In any case, you may want to file a bug with the KDE plasma NM component
because I believe the problem lies there.  It's simply not creating the
adhoc network configuration settings and proving them to NetworkManager
after you click the menu item.

Dan




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]