Re: releasing 1.9 soon...



On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:54:55PM +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
> regarding gtkdoc-fixxref.pl should I just revert that patch:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=91852

It seems, I don't recall any related change that would have
to be reverted, the feature has never been actually used.

> Regarding your proposal below - sounds good. So this means we merely document
> that users can use DISTCLEANFILES in the userdocs and in the gtkdoc.mak. Can you
> suppy a new patch?

Of course.

> Ich checked out the webpage and will start to prepare release notes.

IMO we should test build of documentation of Gnome 2.20
versions of everything at

  http://library.gnome.org/devel/references

before releasing a new gtk-doc.  People of course built
their API documentation, but not necessarily with what we
are going to release and not looking for the same kind of
issues we would.

Yeti

--
http://gwyddion.net/
Index: gtk-doc.make
===================================================================
--- gtk-doc.make	(revision 493)
+++ gtk-doc.make	(working copy)
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@
 	cp $(srcdir)/html/* $(distdir)/html
 	cp $(srcdir)/$(DOC_MODULE).types $(distdir)/
 	cp $(srcdir)/$(DOC_MODULE)-sections.txt $(distdir)/
+	cd $(distdir) && rm -f $(DISTCLEANFILES)
 	-gtkdoc-rebase --online --relative --html-dir=$(distdir)/html
 
 .PHONY : dist-hook-local docs
Index: gtk-doc.notmpl.make
===================================================================
--- gtk-doc.notmpl.make	(revision 493)
+++ gtk-doc.notmpl.make	(working copy)
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@
 	cp $(srcdir)/html/* $(distdir)/html
 	cp $(srcdir)/$(DOC_MODULE).types $(distdir)/
 	cp $(srcdir)/$(DOC_MODULE)-sections.txt $(distdir)/
+	cd $(distdir) && rm -f $(DISTCLEANFILES)
 	-gtkdoc-rebase --online --relative --html-dir=$(distdir)/html
 
 .PHONY : dist-hook-local docs


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]