Re: releasing 1.9 soon...

[Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de>]

hi,

I hope now all patches have been applied. I also added a target milestone to the
bug we fixed in this cycle. This allow me to pull the buglist out of bugzilla
fro the release notes - sorry for the resulting spam. I have also created 1.10
target milestone, so please us that when closing bugs after the release.

Next I'll try to see if the build.gnome.org could run build with snv-trunk
version of gtk-doc. If I have time I'll try a jhbuild of gnome-2.20 locally too.

Stefan

David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> Following the gtk-devel discussion, if we want $SUBJ, things
> concerning srcdir != builddir can be postponed IMO (it has
> never worked properly anyway), and only the following should
> be dealt with:
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338068
>   enable template-free build
>   I'll look at the xml cleaning.
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433338
>   Doesn't rebuild the documentation when the .types file changes
>   As suggesed, I would close as WONTFIX.
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466963
>   1.8 makes make distcheck fail
>   I would close as NOTABUG, but this is politics...
> 
>   http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471014
>   G_CONST_RETURN * G_CONST_RETURN * function not picked up
>   Simple and a patch is available.
> 
> That and the misguided --online option still present in
> fixxref.
> 
> Then we should give it a good testing.
> 
> Yeti
> 
> --
> http://gwyddion.net/
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-doc-list mailing list
> gtk-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list