Re: [PATCH 0/6] Misc fixes and improved annotations

[Víctor M. Jáquez L. <vjaquez igalia com>]

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 09:11:12AM +0200, Simón Pena Placer wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 09:00, Iago Toral <itoral igalia com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:45:21 +0200, Simón Pena Placer <spenap gmail com>
> > wrote:
> >> So here's the question: do I fix these set of patches (the ones
> >> attached to this email) so we can apply them to the repo, and have a
> >> better introspection support for tag 0.9.3, and then prepare and send
> >> the others to start targeting GI's HEAD, or is it better to avoid this
> >> extra step and just go and aim for the HEAD[*]?
> >
> > I say that we go with whatever is in HEAD if these changes in GI are
> > stable (which I guess is the case). Other opinions?
> 
> They had some issues about stability: at some moment, GNOME Shell
> stopped working, and yesterday the #introspection channel in the IRC
> had an unknown amount of activity. They've been bugfixing, and things
> look better now (I think I read they got Shell working again).
> However, if I had been updating gobject-introspection in my jhbuild in
> the beginning, I wouldn't have found that much changes right now: I'll
> fix that in the future, and keep a close eye on them.

The current changes for GI-HEAD, do they have backwards compatibility with
GI-stable?

If so, let's commit them. If not, I think it would be better to wait.

vmjl