Re: [PATCH 0/6] Misc fixes and improved annotations



On 8 September 2010 09:00, Iago Toral <itoral igalia com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 08:45:21 +0200, Simón Pena Placer <spenap gmail com>
> wrote:
>> So here's the question: do I fix these set of patches (the ones
>> attached to this email) so we can apply them to the repo, and have a
>> better introspection support for tag 0.9.3, and then prepare and send
>> the others to start targeting GI's HEAD, or is it better to avoid this
>> extra step and just go and aim for the HEAD[*]?
>
> I say that we go with whatever is in HEAD if these changes in GI are
> stable (which I guess is the case). Other opinions?

They had some issues about stability: at some moment, GNOME Shell
stopped working, and yesterday the #introspection channel in the IRC
had an unknown amount of activity. They've been bugfixing, and things
look better now (I think I read they got Shell working again).
However, if I had been updating gobject-introspection in my jhbuild in
the beginning, I wouldn't have found that much changes right now: I'll
fix that in the future, and keep a close eye on them.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]