Re: Extensions review

On dim, 2014-05-25 at 10:24 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
If we have a downward trend then that
would be awesome to know. :)

Well, for the record, it seems that my extension is working in 3.12 with
no changes, which is a first. I've not been able to get 3.12 running on
my system yet, but I started guiding a user through porting it, who is
using 3.12, and it turned out that just updating the version number was

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]