Re: Scroll to zoom in/out.
- From: Sean Brady <sbrady gtfservices com>
- To: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Scroll to zoom in/out.
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:59:55 -0600
On 04/14/2010 07:58 PM, Jason Sauders wrote:
(In response to comment below) I absolutely positively agree. Gnome
Shell is a fantastic thing, and I can see it going far. Out of all of
the users I have shown Gnome Shell to and have used it for an extensive
period (in the dozens) I can chop a few fingers off and still count on 1
hand how many believed it didn't need a more practical window switcher.
Gnome Shell in its current state, to me, feels like it' s a puzzle. A
really, awesome, elaborate puzzle. But there's a piece missing right in
the center of it, making it difficult to look at and see the "full
picture." A native window/application switcher -on-the-screen- is what's
missing in my opinion.
YES - We can take Gnome Shell and install Docky. But I'm a realist...
telling people that is going to cause a "-1" reputation to Gnome Shell
right off the bat. It should feel complimented in every angle. If you
don't agree with me, you have nothing to worry about because Gnome Shell
currently suits YOU then. I'm speaking on behalf of the majority of
users I've spoken to who also agreed with me that there's that ONE piece
still missing...
Just my 2 cents. Take it for what it's worth.
Rovanion Luckey wrote:
Just one more thing:
GNOME Shell doesn't need a dock, never will, and if you want a
different way to access your applications, just use a dock
yourself or wait until someone develops an add-on for A similar
feature.
We do not want to create the shell as a product that when it is out,
people will talk about it in terms of: "Yes gnome shell is wicked
cool! You just have to add a dock for window switching and then it is
totally awesome!". Gnome Shell should be released as a finished
product, not something where the general consensus is that you have to
change and add a lot of stuff to get it working. It should simply work.
--
www.twitter.com/Rovanion<http://www.twitter.com/Rovanion>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
_______________________________________________
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Yeah, I couldn't agree more. Some UI element is sorely needed that can
allow a user to quickly switch between open windows and/or running
applications without the screen changing or having to remember a key
combination. The user should technically not have to every use the
non-mouse hand for simple tasks IMHO.
The overview is a great concept in many regards, and I think it should
stay, but after using GNOME Shell for a couple weeks now I have to say
that, like it or not, it needs something as a window list. I have 3
Firefox windows open and 2 terminals on 2 desktops- with the overview
all the Firefox and all the terminals look identical. I have to mouse
over each one to get to what I am looking for. That's not very
efficient at all, and quite frankly I am finding it frustrating to the
point of considering discontinuing it's use.
In other words, it's getting in my way. A lot. I would hate to see
what this does for a novice.
Another thing that you have to realize is that by activating the
overview, you change the appearance of the entire screen, which can be
very confusing sometimes. The change in the entire visual appearance,
with windows moving around to order then back again, leaves the user
lost sometimes. I feel like I never know where things are.
I get that there are people here that don't like window lists or
"taskbar" type UI elements, but Alt-tab and picking the app or mousing
over multiple windows in the overview does not add to efficiency in my
opinion.
Everything else, however, is quite fantastic :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]