On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 01:46, iain wrote: > On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 00:34, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > No, I was saying that most (CD burning) programs have an awful lot of > > crap prefs because the developers can't be bothered making a choice, or > > writing proper detection code that would "do the right thing". > > Yes. > Thats a problem with the program. > Not the concept. > > > I hope you get my point. > > Yes, current CD burner writers are crap at UI. > > > I don't want to dumb down/cut down on useful > > features, I want the software to be easy to use. > > No, you quite clearly said that CD burner programs didn't need to be > able to make a bootable CD because people who want to do that know how > to use a command line. > > That is dumbing down. I'm not against making good UIs. I'm against > dumbing down, which is what you were advocating (even if you didn't mean > to). I'd rather not have a feature than a broken one was rather more like what I meant, wrt. bootable CDs. If it doesn't work properly for everything, it'd better not be there. -- /Bastien Nocera http://hadess.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part