Re: Questions regarding Sun's gnome 2.6 implementation
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Jeffery Small <jeff cjsa com>
- Cc: gnome-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Questions regarding Sun's gnome 2.6 implementation
- Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:01:35 +0100
On 11 Oct 2007, at 05:32, Jeffery Small wrote:
Thanks you for this detailed help. I didn't even know about the
gconf-editor
tool. I made the change and now the desktop is working much more
smoothly.
I can't imagine why Sun would ship Gnome 2.0 with this property
disabled
and then ship 2.6 with it enabled.
GNOME 2.0 was never a supported product from Sun, just a free
download for anyone who was interested. (I'm not sure if the
reduced_resources flag even existed in 2.0, I forget off-hand.)
For 2.6, a supported product, we had to support Sun Ray
installations, which generally benefit from the reduced_resources
flag being set. There's also still a lot of old Sun hardware out
there (even more so back when GNOME 2.6 was released), on which GNOME
runs a *lot* less smoothly than CDE. So the reduced_resources flag
was just set by default to provide the smoothest experience for as
many of our users as possible.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com GNOME Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]