Re: New GNOME Website - Plone Deployment

["Jens W. Klein" <jens bluedynamics com>]

Am Wed, 27 May 2009 17:12:51 +0100 schrieb John Carr:
[...]
>>>
>>>  http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/Plone/Deployment
>>
>> This page suggests we use varnish. Try googling "varnish segfault".
>> Personally, I've seen nothing problems with it. Do the plone devs have
>> suggested stable versions of it? It compiles the config file into
>> executable code and loads it. Could we use something novel like
>> Cherokee in its place
> 
> My contacts say they use squid + pound over varnish.

I dont know you contacts. But the ymay use the old-style recommnedation:
apache -> squid -> pound -> zeo-client-cluster

The new-style recommendation is:
nginx -> varnish -> pound -> zeo-client-cluster

For non-intranet-application varnish can do the load-balancing and pound 
can be skipped. 

ad Cheerokee: I dont find any reverse-caching feature in the docs, did i 
oversee something?

regards
-- 
Jens W. Klein - Klein & Partner KEG - BlueDynamics Alliance