Re: Technical feasibility to translate a project on Github

[Thibault Martin <mail thibaultmart in>]

Hello,

Thanks for this quick answer Claude. So that solves the technical 
feasibility.

Now the audience for this question would probably be the translation 
coordinators: would we accept to take the responsibility of translating 
flatpak software?

Best,

Le jeu. 8 oct. 2020 à 23:12, Claude Paroz <claude 2xlibre net> a 
écrit :
> Le 08.10.20 à 14:13, Thibault Martin a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > Flatpak doesn't have a proper translation platform. So far people 
> > retrieve and submit po files manually.
> >
> > I know Flatpak doesn’t necessarily want to be too associated with 
> > GNOME so it doesn’t shy out other systems.
> > Still, a translation provided by one of the major DE could be an 
> > huge improvement to today’s situation.
> >
> > I have two questions here:
> > * Would we accept to take responsibility of Flatpak’s translations?
> > * Is it technically feasible for DL to handle the translations of a 
> > project stored on GitHub?
> >
> > If we answer "yes" to both, I would offer to Flatpak’s team to 
> > take care of their translations, which they may or may not accept.
>
> Hi Thibault,
>
> There is more or less two level of translation supports in D-L.
> The first one is "simply" a status of current module translations + 
> updated pot and merged po files ready for translators to use.
> That's the case for all freedesktop modules.
>
> The second is ability to commit translations from the Web interface. 
> We do not support Github currently for this feature.
>
> So I would say that hosting translation stats would be fine IMHO. 
> Adding commit support is another story, even if it should not be so 
> much effort (to be evaluated, still).
>
> Claude
> --
> www.2xlibre.net
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-i18n mailing list
> gnome-i18n gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n